A silver alert may be issued for which scenario?

A silver alert may be issued for which scenario?

• A. A person aged 60 or older with reversible memory loss.
• B. A person aged 18-59 with irreversible deterioration.
• C. A person aged 60 or older with irreversible deterioration of intellectual faculties; or 18-59 under extraordinary circumstances; law enforcement has determined the missing lacks the capacity to consent; dynamic message signs may rescue.
• D. A person aged 60 or older missing without cognitive concerns.

Answer: (C)

Silver Alerts are activated to help locate missing individuals who are elderly or who have significant cognitive impairment and may not be able to care for themselves. The scenario that best fits is a person aged 60 or older with irreversible deterioration of intellectual faculties, which signals a lasting cognitive decline that raises safety concerns. The policy also allows for a younger adult (18–59) under extraordinary circumstances when law enforcement determines the missing lacks the capacity to consent, and dynamic message signs may aid in quickly reaching the public. The other descriptions don’t fit because reversible memory loss doesn’t indicate a lasting impairment, a 18–59 individual with irreversible deterioration alone lacks the necessary extraordinary circumstance criterion unless specified, and a missing person without cognitive concerns would not meet the alert criteria.

Silver Alerts are activated to help locate missing individuals who are elderly or who have significant cognitive impairment and may not be able to care for themselves. The scenario that best fits is a person aged 60 or older with irreversible deterioration of intellectual faculties, which signals a lasting cognitive decline that raises safety concerns. The policy also allows for a younger adult (18–59) under extraordinary circumstances when law enforcement determines the missing lacks the capacity to consent, and dynamic message signs may aid in quickly reaching the public.

The other descriptions don’t fit because reversible memory loss doesn’t indicate a lasting impairment, a 18–59 individual with irreversible deterioration alone lacks the necessary extraordinary circumstance criterion unless specified, and a missing person without cognitive concerns would not meet the alert criteria.